| Author | Message | ||
  Don (don) 1-Arriviste Username: don Post Number: 1 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.75.49.50 |
The difference being, at least here when I click to SD's Forum Site, I can see and choose from any topic. I can get a chance to post and interact and get at least an response. With Soul-Patrol I can't. It's like being on their form by one's self. | ||
Don (don) 1-Arriviste Username: don Post Number: 3 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.75.49.50 |
Believe me folks I had to wait at least 4-5 dys to be processed before I could get my password, so I could post. | ||
ralph (ralph) Moderator Username: ralph Post Number: 34 Registered: 3-2004 Posted From: 209.240.205.61 |
And it's good to see you are here with us Don. | ||
Don (don) 1-Arriviste Username: don Post Number: 7 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.75.49.50 |
Glad to be here. | ||
jonesy (jonesy) 1-Arriviste Username: jonesy Post Number: 1 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 195.92.168.164 |
New member love Motown Stax any contact would be okay.Any information on new stevie wonder cd in uk? | ||
Juicefree20 (juicefree20) 5-Doyen Username: juicefree20 Post Number: 408 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.46.184.162 |
I just noticed this thread & I agree that this site is different from others, especially the forum part. So, being totally clueless about these things, what makes Soulful Detroit so unique in this regard. Is it the software? Money? Why is it that Soulful Detroits forum is so unique & distinctive from the others? I'm not referring to our luminaries such as Bobby E, Dennis Coffey, Russ, Ralph, etc. I'm talking about the feel of the site, the ease of use, as compared to the other dull sites. This place is a gem, just wondered why SD is so much better. I'm glad that it is  Juice (Message edited by Juicefree20 on May 01, 2004) | ||
Juicefree20 (juicefree20) 6-Zenith Username: juicefree20 Post Number: 461 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.46.184.162 |
Are you telling me that no one has an opinion regarding what differentiates this site from the others???? Sad! | ||
Nosey (nosey) 3-Pundit Username: nosey Post Number: 57 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 64.12.116.138 |
Juice I love the site as well until I see that some of my posts didn't "take". I agree it is a user-friendly site and the people are great! | ||
Juicefree20 (juicefree20) 6-Zenith Username: juicefree20 Post Number: 462 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.46.184.162 |
Well thank you Sister Nosey. I knew that I wasn't the only one who sees the difference in quality. | ||
johneflat (johneflat) 3-Pundit Username: johneflat Post Number: 32 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 205.188.116.138 |
i just feel more at home here than at Soul-Patrol. :-) | ||
Stonewall (stonewall) 1-Arriviste Username: stonewall Post Number: 4 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.237.26.43 |
I never heard of "Soul Patrol". Is it a black police group? By the way, Mr. Juice-free Man.... U overlooked at least one "luminary". Your apology in advance is, of course, accepted. | ||
Juicefree20 (juicefree20) 6-Zenith Username: juicefree20 Post Number: 486 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.46.184.162 |
STONEWALL! Hello. The reason why I left you out in this thread is because a certain friend of yours stated in the old forum, that the two of you were persona non grata. That's what happened here. My apologies!!! | ||
Stonewall (stonewall) 1-Arriviste Username: stonewall Post Number: 8 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.237.26.43 |
Oh, Free of Juice, U see that "old friend" was really an "old liar". Can we presume he's dead? More importantly, I've missed your many postings, etc. Oh, actually, I was just playin' w/ U, J-Man, as when U mentioned about the "luminaries" (I luv that word), U didn't know that S & S and Charise and others were back. "It crossed in the Mail". Butt, U did know Sister Detroit and Soul Sister were on board. I consider them SDF luminaries. U don't? "Uh, oh, better get Macco." | ||
Eli (phillysoulman) 5-Doyen Username: phillysoulman Post Number: 183 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.236.31.246 |
I was made aware the other night that the Yahoo groups Soulmusic Home forum had ILLEGALY posted photos belonging to me, which I had posted here on SD! Needless to day, I was livid. I instantly emailed them and had them removed. | ||
Juicefree20 (juicefree20) 6-Zenith Username: juicefree20 Post Number: 491 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.46.184.162 |
What's up all! STONEWALL: the folks that I didn't mention were the folks that I had seen post in the new forum. Naturally I would have mentioned Bobby E, as he's cool with me. Naturally, I would have mentioned Sister Detroit, Soul Sister & Charise. It's just that they were already on board, so, there was no need to ask where they were. Bobby E: I know that I kid around with pictures & I have to find out what's acceptable & what's not, as regards posting them. As you pointed out, some may take offense. I don't think it's cool that someone ripped off your pictures & posted them elsewhere. What would be the best workaround for this type of situation? Peace! Juice | ||
Eli (phillysoulman) 5-Doyen Username: phillysoulman Post Number: 186 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 68.236.24.64 |
The person who posted them was a former SD pooster who started a site with David Nathan on yahoo. They SHOULD know better. | ||
1wicked (1wicked) 2-Debutant Username: 1wicked Post Number: 15 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.126.64.72 |
"E"...I'm sure TC meant no harm...but it was wrong to use your images without permission. If your time permits...you may want to check into "Digimarc" (www.digimarc.com), which will allow you to watermark your images (at a minimum)...with several great upgrades available. | ||
Ritchie (ritchie) 4-Laureate Username: ritchie Post Number: 111 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 62.254.0.32 |
There is a major difference between generic images and someone's personal photos - and it doesn't take a degree in Musicology to be able to tell them apart. While something like a scan of a well-known album sleeve might be "borrowed" unnoticed, a personal photograph posted for the benefit of friends is something unique, and should be viewed with respect. I fully agree with Bobby - it's only common courtesy to ask - before republishing. When I was putting my Temptations early history article together, I wanted to use David's pic of Johnnie Mae Matthews' house. I asked, he gave permission - and I credited the source. It really isn't a major effort to send a polite email request, which seems obvious to me. I guess some folks view the internet as the world's biggest free library, and feel no need for such courtesy. | ||
Juicefree20 (juicefree20) 6-Zenith Username: juicefree20 Post Number: 495 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 24.46.184.162 |
Good point Bobby & Ritchie. Let me ask you this: If these folks had given proper credit, would that practice still be verbotten? In other words, the proper way to do it would be to ask the owner, regardless, whether you credit the source or not. I ask this because, I've seen a lot of what Bobby describes, on the internet daily. I, myself, am not very versed on the proper ettiquette of thes things. I would never want to offend anyone by misusing their pictures in such fashion. I ask, because as you may know, I do little parodies from time to time with pictures. I would not want to be guilty of any wrong-doing in any way. I definitely would never use anyones picture in a misleading fashion, as though it was my property to post. Peace! Juice |
