The difference between Soulful Detroi... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

AtD Archives - Beginning April 2004 The difference between Soulful Detroit Forum & Soul-Patrol's Previous Next

Author Message
Top of pageBottom of page

Don (don)
1-Arriviste
Username: don

Post Number: 1
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.75.49.50
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 1:42 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The difference being, at least here when I click to SD's Forum Site, I can see and choose from any topic. I can get a chance to post and interact and get at least an response. With Soul-Patrol I can't. It's like being on their form by one's self.
Top of pageBottom of page

Don (don)
1-Arriviste
Username: don

Post Number: 3
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.75.49.50
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 2:24 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Believe me folks I had to wait at least 4-5 dys to be processed before I could get my password, so
I could post.
Top of pageBottom of page

ralph (ralph)
Moderator
Username: ralph

Post Number: 34
Registered: 3-2004
Posted From: 209.240.205.61
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 2:30 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

And it's good to see you are here with us Don.
Top of pageBottom of page

Don (don)
1-Arriviste
Username: don

Post Number: 7
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.75.49.50
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 3:25 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Glad to be here.
Top of pageBottom of page

jonesy (jonesy)
1-Arriviste
Username: jonesy

Post Number: 1
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 195.92.168.164
Posted on Saturday, April 17, 2004 - 6:36 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

New member love Motown Stax any contact would be okay.Any information on new stevie wonder cd in uk?
Top of pageBottom of page

Juicefree20 (juicefree20)
5-Doyen
Username: juicefree20

Post Number: 408
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.46.184.162
Posted on Saturday, May 01, 2004 - 5:46 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I just noticed this thread & I agree that this site is different from others, especially the forum part. So, being totally clueless about these things, what makes Soulful Detroit so unique in this regard. Is it the software? Money? Why is it that Soulful Detroits forum is so unique & distinctive from the others? I'm not referring to our luminaries such as Bobby E, Dennis Coffey, Russ, Ralph, etc. I'm talking about the feel of the site, the ease of use, as compared to the other dull sites. This place is a gem, just wondered why SD is so much better. I'm glad that it is :-)

Juice

(Message edited by Juicefree20 on May 01, 2004)
Top of pageBottom of page

Juicefree20 (juicefree20)
6-Zenith
Username: juicefree20

Post Number: 461
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.46.184.162
Posted on Sunday, May 02, 2004 - 5:36 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Are you telling me that no one has an opinion regarding what differentiates this site from the others???? Sad!
Top of pageBottom of page

Nosey (nosey)
3-Pundit
Username: nosey

Post Number: 57
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 64.12.116.138
Posted on Sunday, May 02, 2004 - 5:42 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Juice I love the site as well until I see that some of my posts didn't "take". I agree it is a user-friendly site and the people are great!
Top of pageBottom of page

Juicefree20 (juicefree20)
6-Zenith
Username: juicefree20

Post Number: 462
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.46.184.162
Posted on Sunday, May 02, 2004 - 5:52 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Well thank you Sister Nosey. I knew that I wasn't the only one who sees the difference in quality.
Top of pageBottom of page

johneflat (johneflat)
3-Pundit
Username: johneflat

Post Number: 32
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 205.188.116.138
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 1:12 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

i just feel more at home here than at Soul-Patrol.
:-)
Top of pageBottom of page

Stonewall (stonewall)
1-Arriviste
Username: stonewall

Post Number: 4
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.237.26.43
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 2:11 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I never heard of "Soul Patrol". Is it a black police group?


By the way, Mr. Juice-free Man.... U overlooked at least one "luminary". Your apology in advance is, of course, accepted.
Top of pageBottom of page

Juicefree20 (juicefree20)
6-Zenith
Username: juicefree20

Post Number: 486
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.46.184.162
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 2:27 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

STONEWALL! Hello.

The reason why I left you out in this thread is because a certain friend of yours stated in the old forum, that the two of you were persona non grata. That's what happened here. My apologies!!!
Top of pageBottom of page

Stonewall (stonewall)
1-Arriviste
Username: stonewall

Post Number: 8
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.237.26.43
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 3:19 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Oh, Free of Juice, U see that "old friend" was really an "old liar". Can we presume he's dead? More importantly, I've missed your many postings, etc.

Oh, actually, I was just playin' w/ U, J-Man, as when U mentioned about the "luminaries" (I luv that word), U didn't know that S & S and Charise and others were back. "It crossed in the Mail". Butt, U did know Sister Detroit and Soul Sister were on board. I consider them SDF luminaries. U don't? "Uh, oh, better get Macco."
Top of pageBottom of page

Eli (phillysoulman)
5-Doyen
Username: phillysoulman

Post Number: 183
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.236.31.246
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 10:00 am: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

I was made aware the other night that the Yahoo groups Soulmusic Home forum had ILLEGALY posted photos belonging to me, which I had posted here on SD!
Needless to day, I was livid.
I instantly emailed them and had them removed.
Top of pageBottom of page

Juicefree20 (juicefree20)
6-Zenith
Username: juicefree20

Post Number: 491
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.46.184.162
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 1:12 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

What's up all!

STONEWALL: the folks that I didn't mention were the folks that I had seen post in the new forum. Naturally I would have mentioned Bobby E, as he's cool with me. Naturally, I would have mentioned Sister Detroit, Soul Sister & Charise. It's just that they were already on board, so, there was no need to ask where they were.

Bobby E: I know that I kid around with pictures & I have to find out what's acceptable & what's not, as regards posting them. As you pointed out, some may take offense. I don't think it's cool that someone ripped off your pictures & posted them elsewhere. What would be the best workaround for this type of situation?

Peace!
Juice
Top of pageBottom of page

Eli (phillysoulman)
5-Doyen
Username: phillysoulman

Post Number: 186
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 68.236.24.64
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 1:25 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

The person who posted them was a former SD pooster who started a site with David Nathan on yahoo.
They SHOULD know better.
Top of pageBottom of page

1wicked (1wicked)
2-Debutant
Username: 1wicked

Post Number: 15
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.126.64.72
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 1:29 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

"E"...I'm sure TC meant no harm...but it was wrong to use your images without permission. If your time permits...you may want to check into "Digimarc" (www.digimarc.com), which will allow you to watermark your images (at a minimum)...with several great upgrades available.
Top of pageBottom of page

Ritchie (ritchie)
4-Laureate
Username: ritchie

Post Number: 111
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 62.254.0.32
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 1:49 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

There is a major difference between generic images and someone's personal photos - and it doesn't take a degree in Musicology to be able to tell them apart. While something like a scan of a well-known album sleeve might be "borrowed" unnoticed, a personal photograph posted for the benefit of friends is something unique, and should be viewed with respect. I fully agree with Bobby - it's only common courtesy to ask - before republishing. When I was putting my Temptations early history article together, I wanted to use David's pic of Johnnie Mae Matthews' house. I asked, he gave permission - and I credited the source. It really isn't a major effort to send a polite email request, which seems obvious to me. I guess some folks view the internet as the world's biggest free library, and feel no need for such courtesy.
Top of pageBottom of page

Juicefree20 (juicefree20)
6-Zenith
Username: juicefree20

Post Number: 495
Registered: 4-2004
Posted From: 24.46.184.162
Posted on Monday, May 03, 2004 - 2:08 pm: Edit PostDelete PostView Post/Check IPPrint PostMove Post (Moderator/Admin Only)Ban Poster IP (Moderator/Admin only)

Good point Bobby & Ritchie. Let me ask you this: If these folks had given proper credit, would that practice still be verbotten? In other words, the proper way to do it would be to ask the owner, regardless, whether you credit the source or not. I ask this because, I've seen a lot of what Bobby describes, on the internet daily. I, myself, am not very versed on the proper ettiquette of thes things. I would never want to offend anyone by misusing their pictures in such fashion. I ask, because as you may know, I do little parodies from time to time with pictures. I would not want to be guilty of any wrong-doing in any way. I definitely would never use anyones picture in a misleading fashion, as though it was my property to post.

Peace!
Juice

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.