| Author | Message | ||
  motesartsound (uncle_derrald) 2-Debutant Username: uncle_derrald Post Number: 11 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 66.127.78.211 |
Folks: allmusic.com has re-formatted its webpage, so take a look at it, and I'd love to hear your input on in this site. Cheers, Derrald | ||
Eli (phillysoulman) 6-Zenith Username: phillysoulman Post Number: 673 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 152.163.252.200 |
I like the old format much better. | ||
LarsC (the_norwegian) 3-Pundit Username: the_norwegian Post Number: 42 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 80.203.27.167 |
Nice! It's much more userfriendly than the old one. BUT the required registration for some of the functions is a real turn-off. If the information had been more reliable I could understand but there are too many small errors. And too much info is absent. In time it will become a great resource, it'll just take some more work to get it right  | ||
Wonder B (wonder_b) 6-Zenith Username: wonder_b Post Number: 575 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 80.15.111.60 |
Yes I prefered the old one... this new one is VERY slow too... the old one would take you to pages in a sec... And also they should stop putting the reissues refrences instead of the original ones because it messes up all the info in the discographies... (or put the reissues in a separate category) Wonder B | ||
zebop (zebop) 4-Laureate Username: zebop Post Number: 72 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 152.163.252.200 |
I like the old one much better too. IMO the site's lost something in the past few years. It's too many keystrokes and not enough passion. It's not sour grapes, it's something I noticed while I was there. | ||
John Barry Sheffield (jaybs) 3-Pundit Username: jaybs Post Number: 43 Registered: 4-2004 Posted From: 195.92.168.164 |
Well I like the new format, but I do think the old site was much better for the devoted record researcher on tracks and albums of an artist. John |
